Martin's Rugby Coaching Forum

Please feel free to participate and post your questions to this forum. You do not need to register to post, registered users have more options.
It is currently Mon May 20, 2013 2:40 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ]




Post a reply
Username:
Subject:
Message body:
Enter your message here, it may contain no more than 60000 characters. 

Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
Options:
BBCode is OFF
Smilies are ON
Disable smilies
Do not automatically parse URLs
Sort the rugby players in their teams
Sort the rugby players in their teams
Please select the options below to the correct list to avoid automated registrations.
All Blacks
Ireland
Ronan O'Gara
Jonah Lomu
Brian O'Driscoll
Aron Cruden
Dan Carter
   

Topic review - "Old" Methods still work?
Author Message
  Post subject:  10 push ups?  Reply with quote
I do not believe in this anymore. players should be challenged to perform the skill rather than be afraid to make a mistake. Wrong side of the "Flow" model. If players go for the safe option and do not take risks than they learn nothing new.
Post Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 11:30 pm
  Post subject:  Mistakes  Reply with quote
Along these lines: we had to do 10 push ups everytime we dropped the ball. Is there a scientific reason for that?

As opposed to intrinsic motivation, that sort of stuff!
Post Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:54 pm
  Post subject:  Better  Reply with quote
Guest wrote:
The 10 k run is no longer applicable, and (if you REALLY have to do them) the 200 metre runs can be more effectively coached with the use of a ball ( I have a few killer stamina drills thatreflect the demands of the game - they kill far more effectively than plodding around a cross country course).


Would you say coached or thatreflect is better?
Post Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 12:44 am
  Post subject:  SSDD  Reply with quote
This is just another case of SSDD and i am sure that you will all agree with me.
Post Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 5:47 am
  Post subject:   Reply with quote
Speaking (sorry writing) as someone who was around at the same time, I think the answer is that 30 years ago, none of us knew any better way of doing things. The reason that these methods turn off (especially youngsters) is that science and the internet has given all of us so much more info on how to train much more effectively according to positional requirements. The 10 k run is no longer applicable, and (if you REALLY have to do them) the 200 metre runs can be more effectively coached with the use of a ball ( I have a few killer stamina drills thatreflect the demands of the game - they kill far more effectively than plodding around a cross country course). Players today do not need to be scared of the coach, and honestly speaking the harshness of the coaching methods of the days of yore were often the only way out for the coach who knew no better. If the players don't want to do it hard work themselves - if they have to be forced to do anything - then they are not going to be trustworthy players. The desire has to come from within, and to be encouraged and nurtured from without.
Post Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 10:20 am
  Post subject:  "Old" Methods still work?  Reply with quote
When I was being coached into rugby nearly 30 years ago there was a strong hard work ethic. Coaches would break down the players, be verbally very present.... My coach would put in extra 200 meter runs at the end of the practise, we did 10k or higher runs. I remember long training sessions in the mud.

The reason behing this was to harden the players and instill discipline in the team. We had great success as a team.

Are these methods of training self-reliance and discipline still valid? I feel that they turn youngster away from the game.
Post Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 4:37 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ]


Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group