Martin's Rugby Coaching Forum

Please feel free to participate and post your questions to this forum. You do not need to register to post, registered users have more options.
It is currently Thu May 23, 2013 1:12 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ]




Post a reply
Username:
Subject:
Message body:
Enter your message here, it may contain no more than 60000 characters. 

Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
Options:
BBCode is OFF
Smilies are ON
Disable smilies
Do not automatically parse URLs
Sort the rugby players in their teams
Sort the rugby players in their teams
Please select the options below to the correct list to avoid automated registrations.
All Blacks
Ireland
Dan Carter
Aron Cruden
Ronan O'Gara
Brian O'Driscoll
Jonah Lomu
   

Topic review - IRB ruling re. Law 17 Maul, in-goal
Author Message
  Post subject:  IRB ruling re. Law 17 Maul, in-goal  Reply with quote
To: Secretaries / CEOs of Unions and Regional Associations in Membership
From: David Carrigy, Head of External & Member Relations

Subject: Law Ruling by Designated Members of Rugby Committee

Date:September 24, 2008

Ruling: 4: 2008 The RFU has requested a ruling relating to Law 17 A maul is formed with Team A pushing their opponents (Team B) back towards their own goal line with the ball being clearly visible at the rear of the maul, all the defending side (Team B) bound to the maul voluntarily exit the maul, has the maul successfully concluded or is the maul still active?

Law 17 Maul, Definition A maul occurs when a player carrying the ball is held by one or more opponents, and one or more of the ball carrier’s team mates bind on the ball carrier. A maul therefore consists of at least three players, all on their feet; the ball carrier and one player from each team.
All the players involved must be caught in or bound to the maul and must be on their feet and moving towards a goal line. Open play has ended.

The Designated Members have ruled the following in answer to the question raised:The maul has not successfully concluded and it is not still active. As the players of the team not in possession have all left the maul the maul ceases to exist and has not ended successfully or unsuccessfully as determined by the definition of a maul. The maul has ceased to exist and the ball is now in open play and the relevant Laws apply

Yours sincerely,

David Carrigy
Head of External and Member Relations
Post Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 4:31 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ]


Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group