![]() |
Every coach needs to assess the fitness level of his players, you can of course look at their play, does it fall apart in the last 15 minutes, or put players to a test program. Here is an overview of fitness tests and how they relate to each other.
When subjecting your athletes to any test, take care of the following:
The table below gives you the pros and cons of most used tests.
Area |
Tests |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
|
Body Composition or Anthropometrics |
Height/weight |
Simple |
Takes no account of muscle mass |
|
Body mass index |
Simple |
Lacks accuracy |
|
Body fat - weight scale |
Quick and accurate |
Needs special scale - now more reliable |
|
|
Body fat - calipers |
Quick and accurate |
Technique needs practice. |
|
|
Endurance or Aerobic Capacity |
Cooper test |
Easy to administer |
Needs a track. |
|
Large groups can be tested. |
Accuracy of measurement, and calibration of tape/tape recorder a problem. Better use the beeptest software you can download from this site! |
||
|
Accurate |
Need equipment |
||
|
Step test |
Submaximal |
Small inaccuracies in measurement of recovery heart rate give large variations in results. |
|
|
Accurate |
Needs study and equipment |
||
|
Large groups can be tested |
Difficult to reproduce results |
||
|
Strength / Power |
Sargent jump |
Basic vertical jump test |
Standardizing technique, needs equipment |
Curl-ups / Sit-up |
Basic test |
Needs standardizing using a mat |
|
|
Medicine ball throw |
Measures arm and upper body strength |
Scores influenced by technique |
|
|
Multi gym measurements |
Measurements can be made on a variety of muscle groups. |
Need equipment. |
|
Anaerobic threshold |
Maximum heart rate monitors |
Basic test |
empirical, not accurate. Needs equipment |
220 - ages rule |
Quick, easy |
empirical |
|
better than above |
Needs track and equipment |
||
Lab tests |
accurate |
complicated, needs lab |
|
De-hydration |
Easy to do |
Gives only indication |
|
|
Speed |
Hand-timed sprints |
Easy to administer. |
Not accurate enough to reflect any changes in performance. |
|
Flexibility |
Sit and reach |
Simple measure hamstring and lower back mobility. |
Need to standardize technique. |
|
Other |
|
Measurements quite gross and influenced by other factors. |
Original table compiled by John Brewer, later additions by Don de Winter and Martin Slagt
Test sets
You can combine these tests to a representative set and of course the Ozzies have sorted this out. The University of Queensland Rugby Academy's Skill and Physiological Testing programs focus on enhancing physical and core rugby skills required to perform at a higher level. A variety of tests are offered, appropriate to player age and relevance to specific rugby programs. The UQ School of Human Movement Studies can facilitate the following physiological tests for your program:
Players are given a comprehensive assessment across a number of identified core skills:
For more advanced teams, the assessment extends to simple running lines:
As you can see, also rugby specific tests. Would be interesting to see all the test results they have and the opportunity to put your results against that database. Download an overview of the test here.
Dutch Under21 program
While working with the
Dutch National Under 21 team we used fitness testing to create
awareness amongst our player of their responsibility for their physical fitness. Also we
focused selected players: if they did not improve, they would have to
leave the selection. The Under 21 program is described on
this page.
VO2max values
The VO2max tells you
something about the amount of oxygen your body is using. Originally
performed on a bicycle, the test has also been performed on a
treadmill. Look here to compute VO2max values from
Cooper test results. More info on the Cooper Test here. The Beeptest software also gives you an indication of VO2max, the value of this is still debated. The Wingate or the bicycle/treadmill test are still the best.
![]() ![]() |
Last updated on 4-7-07 |